Call ERP Experts if your ERP project has led to arbitration.

Unlock Arbitration Success with Expert Insight: Our firm, led by seasoned IT consultant Brooks Hilliard, delivers courtroom-tested expertise in computer systems, software disputes, and licensing agreements. Trust us to clarify complex technology terms and secure favorable outcomes across federal, state, and arbitration cases.

Call ERP Experts if your ERP project has led to arbitration.

Unlock Arbitration Success with Expert Insight: Our firm, led by seasoned IT consultant Brooks Hilliard, delivers courtroom-tested expertise in computer systems, software disputes, and licensing agreements. Trust us to clarify complex technology terms and secure favorable outcomes across federal, state, and arbitration cases.

Examination of BigCommerce Release Notes

Examination of BigCommerce


Examination of BigCommerce API Release Notes, last updated 03/25/2025

1. Release Notes – January 9, 2025

  • Errata:
    • No obvious errors in the documentation summary itself, but the mention of a “Unified Billing Postman collection” lacks a direct link or further explanation in the notes, which could confuse developers seeking it.
    • The shift from entityId to id in GraphQL Admin API is noted, but the documentation doesn’t specify a migration guide, potentially leaving ambiguity for existing implementations.
  • Significant Defects:
    • Breaking Change to v2 Orders API: The side-loadable consignment response change, effective August 2025, is a major alteration. Developers relying on the current structure will need to refactor, and the eight-month lead time might not suffice for complex systems, risking disruptions in order processing.
    • Removal of variants Field from Update Products (Batch): This could break integrations that depend on batch variant updates, especially for stores with large catalogs, as no workaround is explicitly provided.
  • Customer Outcry Potential:
    • The v2 Orders API change could spark frustration among developers unprepared for the shift, especially if they miss the announcement. Historically, breaking API changes without robust transition support have led to developer backlash on platforms like X or GitHub Issues.
    • The removal of variants might frustrate merchants with variant-heavy workflows, though no specific outcry is documented yet.

2. Release Notes – October 20, 2024

  • Errata:
    • The clarification of admin-only access for B2B API tokens might be redundant if previously implied, suggesting possible prior documentation oversight.
    • The correction of the company parameter description (filter by name, not ID) indicates an earlier error that could have misled developers, though it’s now fixed.
  • Significant Defects:
    • Removal of 40 Concurrent Request Limit: While framed as an improvement, the shift to “adaptive limits” lacks transparency on what those limits are, potentially leading to unpredictable throttling and affecting high-traffic integrations.
  • Customer Outcry Potential:
    • The adaptive limits could annoy developers who relied on predictable throttling, especially if BigCommerce enforces strict caps without warning. No widespread complaints are evident yet, but this opacity might brew discontent if performance issues arise.

3. Release Notes – February 21, 2024

  • Errata:
    • No clear errors noted, though the release notes could better detail how the new webhooks (store/modifier/updated, etc.) differ from existing ones to avoid confusion.
  • Significant Defects:
    • None immediately apparent. The additions (e.g., Tax Settings API, cart metafields) are enhancements rather than disruptive changes.
  • Customer Outcry Potential:
    • These updates are developer-friendly (e.g., GA of Promotions API), so outcry is unlikely. The lack of breaking changes here suggests minimal friction.

4. Release Notes – October 20, 2024 (Beta)

  • Errata:
    • The deprecation of ssl_status in the Sites API redirecting to a Site Certificate endpoint assumes developers know where to look, which might not be intuitive without a linked reference.
  • Significant Defects:
    • Deprecation of ssl_status: While not immediate, this could disrupt workflows for developers who built around it, especially if the new endpoint lacks parity in functionality.
  • Customer Outcry Potential:
    • Beta changes typically see less immediate outcry, but the ssl_status deprecation might irritate developers if the transition isn’t seamless. No specific backlash is noted yet.

5. Release Notes – May 3, 2023

  • Errata:
    • The splitting of the Catalog API into seven parts is well-documented, but the notes don’t mention potential versioning conflicts for older integrations still using the unified spec.
  • Significant Defects:
    • Pages V2 Deprecation: This is a significant shift, and without a clear timeline or migration tool, developers might face challenges transitioning to V3, especially for legacy stores.
    • Lower Concurrency Limits on Price List Endpoints: This could throttle performance for stores with frequent price updates, a potential defect for high-volume merchants.
  • Customer Outcry Potential:
    • The Pages V2 deprecation likely caused some frustration in 2023, as legacy systems often resist rapid API shifts. The concurrency limits might also have annoyed merchants with dynamic pricing needs, though no specific uproar is documented here.

6. Release Notes – Undated (General Updates)

  • Errata:
    • The lack of specific dates makes it hard to track when changes like payload limits or the sort parameter were introduced, reducing traceability.
  • Significant Defects:
    • Payload Limits on Inventory API: Without specifics on the limits, this could unexpectedly break large inventory syncs, a defect for enterprise users.
  • Customer Outcry Potential:
    • Inventory API limits might have frustrated merchants with large catalogs, especially if sync failures occurred without clear guidance. No direct evidence of outcry exists in the notes, but this is a plausible pain point.

Critical Analysis

  • Errata Trends: BigCommerce’s release notes occasionally lack depth (e.g., missing migration guides, vague references), which could confuse developers. However, most corrections (e.g., company parameter) suggest they’re addressing past oversights responsibly.
  • Significant Defects: Breaking changes like the v2 Orders API update and Pages V2 deprecation stand out as high-risk, potentially disrupting merchant operations if not handled proactively. The lack of transparency on adaptive limits or payload caps adds uncertainty, a defect in itself for API reliability.
  • Customer Outcry: While no explicit X posts or forum threads are cited here (due to my scope), the nature of breaking changes and performance constraints (e.g., concurrency limits, variant removal) aligns with typical developer grievances seen in e-commerce platforms. Historically, BigCommerce API changes have sparked occasional criticism on platforms like Reddit or Twitter when they disrupt workflows, but nothing catastrophic is evident from these notes alone.

Recommendations

  • For Developers: Monitor the v2 Orders API change closely and test the August 2025 update in staging. Prepare for Pages V3 migration if still on V2.
  • For BigCommerce: Provide detailed migration guides for breaking changes and clarify ambiguous limits (e.g., adaptive throttling, payload caps) to preempt outcry.
  • Further Investigation: Search X or BigCommerce forums for terms like “v2 Orders API” or “variants batch” post-January 2025 to gauge real user sentiment.